Legal Opinion

Timmons v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1898No. 558PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio. Plaintiff in error was indicted under section 3893, Kev.

Read the full summary

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio. Plaintiff in error was indicted under section 3893, Kev. St., as amended by Act Sept. 26, 1888 (1 Supp. p. 621; 25 Stat. 496), providing: “Every obscene, lewd or lascivious book or pamphlet, -picture, paper, letter, writing, print, or other publication of an indecent character * * * whether sealed as first-class matter or not, are hereby declared to be non-mailable matter, and shall not be conveyed in the mails, nor delivered from any post-office, nor by any letter-carrier; and any person who shall…

1Opinion of the CourtClark, District Judge

The contention of counsel for plaintiff in error is that the charge in the indictment that the letter was “obscene, lewd, and lascivious” is insufficient, without adding the words, “and of an indecent character.” Ibis argued that it requires the addition of these to make tlie letter one of the character declared to be nonmailable by the statute, and so to constitute the statutory offense. It is said the word “oh-, scene” has a defined meaning, which is not the same as “indecency.” In just what respect there is a difference, for any practical purpose or in ordinary usage, has not been made…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Price v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Commonwealth v. SharplessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1815

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Parmelee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Rinker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. United States v. MusgraveDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1908
  4. Jacob Hoffmann Brewing Co. v. McElligottDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1919
  5. Lockhart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API