Legal Opinion

McMann v. Murphy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 18, 1927PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Probate Court allowing a motion to frame issues for a trial by jury in a contested will case. The issues were the soundness of mind of the testatrix and the fraud and undue influence of Margaret K. McMann. The motion was allowed upon an offer of proof by the contestants.

The principles which should govern the Probate Court in deciding a motion for a jury trial in a contested will case were stated in Fuller v. Sylvia, 240 Mass. 49. It is to be presumed that the judge, in deciding as he did, was governed by these principles. Clark v. McNeil, 246 Mass. 250,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shailer v. BumsteadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Fuller v. SylviaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. Clark v. McNeilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Burroughs v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Raposa v. OliveiraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Eddy v. EddyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Smith v. PattersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Marshall v. CramMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Cade v. HoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Santry v. FranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API