Legal Opinion
Garcia Hernandez v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 28, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2014-0297PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge
The plaintiff, Doris Nohemi Garcia Hernandez, prevailed at trial on her claim of pregnancy discrimination and now seeks from her former employer, the defendant Chipotle Mexican . Grill, a total of $838,122.00 in attorneys’ fees and costs for 2073 hours of billed work. Pi’s Pet, Att’ys’ Fees & Costs ("Pi’s Pet.”) at 1, ECF No. 137. The parties agree that the plaintiff is entitled to attorneys’ fees, id., Def.’s Opp’n PL’s Pet. (“Def.’s Opp’n”) at 1, ECF No. 139, and that most of the fees should be awarded based .on the 2016-17 United States…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gatore v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Brackett v. KellyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Craig v. LewDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Leopold v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Lewis v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.