Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Crane Co. v. Progressive Enterprises Inc.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided August 23, 1976No. Civ. A. 75-125-NNPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CLARKE, District Judge.

This action was brought to recover the unpaid balance allegedly due for the purchase of a cast iron deaerator supplied by the plaintiff, Crane Company [hereinafter referred to as “Crane”], to the defendant, Progressive Enterprises, Inc. [hereinafter referred to as “Progressive”] to be installed as part of defendant’s contract with the United States. Jurisdiction of the District Court is based upon the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 270b(a) and (b).

The material facts of the case are not in serious dispute. Plaintiff, on May 3, 1974, submitted a written proposal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Rose v. Vulcan Materials CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Roth Steel Products, and Toledo Steel Tube Company, Cross-Appellants v. Sharon Steel Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  2. Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. Man Industries (INDIA), Ltd, Prime Pipe International, Inc., and the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  3. Missouri Public Service Co. v. Peabody Coal Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Kelsey-Hayes Co. v. Galtaco Redlaw Castings Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1990
  5. General Motors Corp. v. Paramount Metal Products Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API