Legal Opinion

Stewart v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 7, 1933No. 15844Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is predicated on the proposition that this court should hold as a matter of law that his confession introduced in evidence by the state was not voluntarily made. Under the peculiar manner in which the question came into the record the point is presented in an unusual way. From bill of exception No. 3 it appears that when the state sought to introduce the confession appellant requested that the jury be withdrawn which was done. In the jury’s absence the testimony of State Ranger McWilliams and of appellant was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McVeigh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
  2. Caudle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API