McVeigh v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The only questions discussed in the opinion on this appeal relate to the confessions of appellant; and these questions are so clearly and fully stated in the opinion as to render any further statement unnecessary.
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of burglary, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.
The State introduced appellant’s confessions against him. Appellant excepted on the ground that he was under arrest at the time the confessions were made, and was not properly warned, and, if properly warned, that the eonefssions were made to officers under promises of reward and persuasion. . The State’s witnesses (the sheriff and his deputy) testify that a proper warning was given, to wit, that they told appellant before he confessed to the theft that same would be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Guinn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Unsell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
3Cited by13 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- McCain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Reese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.