Legal Opinion
Shafer v. Regan
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 24, 1992PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1008OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Appellate Division that the impracticability of competitive testing for the position of Municipal Financial Analyst was not established. Nor did the record disclose any different or additional qualifications which would distinguish Municipal Financial Analysts from auditors placed in the competitive class. There was therefore no rational basis for the wholesale exemption of all Municipal Financial Analysts from civil service competitive examination (cf., Matter of Grossman v…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Grossman v. RankinNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Condell v. JorlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by7 opinions
- Matter of Spence v. New York State Dept. of Civ. Serv.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Brynien v. New York State Department of Civil ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. State UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Board of Education v. Christa Construction, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Anderson v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.