Legal Opinion

Bosco v. Labor & Industry Review Commission

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 3, 2003No. 03-0662PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, EJ.

¶ 1. This appeal is brought under the Worker's Compensation Act; specifically at issue is the interpretation of Wis. Stat. § 102.23(5) (2001-02). A.T. Polishing Company (A.T.) and Shelby Insurance Company (Shelby) appeal a circuit court order reversing the Labor & Industry Review Commission's (LIRC's) conclusion that it was reasonable under § 102.23(5) for Shelby to have delayed making payments to A.T.'s employee Cesare Bosco even though he had an undisputed permanent total disability due to occupational exposure occurring while an employee at A.T. We affirm the circuit court's…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. UFE Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. County of Jefferson v. RenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Cruz v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Weiss v. Regent Properties, Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  5. City of Muskego v. GodecWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bosco v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Rock Tenn Co. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API