Legal Opinion
Barker v. Huey
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 28, 1903No. 4567Published
Appeal by Edgar E. Barker et al., heirs at law of Oliver P. Barker, deceased, from an ex parte order of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered October 7, 1902, vacating an order made June 13, 1902, denying a petition to sell real estate to pay debts.
1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.
Oliver P. Barker died September 3, 1901, leaving the following will:
“Providence Hospital.
“I, O. P. Barker, in sound mind and memory leave in case of my death Hotel Barker 1205 Pirst Avenue, Seattle, Washington, to Miss Mollie Huey and Mrs. Hora Huey, both of Seattle, to have and to hold and run and receive all proceeds arising from the same for three years. At the expiration of that time it is my wish that the foresaid lease and furniture in said Hotel Barker be sold and one-half of the proceeds thereof be set aside for the sole use of Malba Washburn, a minor, residing at 1822, 7th Avenue,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kuhn v. MasonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Burnham v. Spokane Mercantile Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
- Coyle v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
- Dickson v. MathesonWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Roberts v. Shelton Southwestern RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.