King v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Melvin Mayfield, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, entered upon a conditional plea of nolo contendere, for driving while intoxicated, first offense. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress.
At the suppression hearing held May 16, 1991, Officer Jim Ragland, who is employed by the City of Marshall, testified that he and Deputy Sheriff George Sutterfield were together in Ragland’s patrol car on Highway 27 North, inside the Marshall city limits, when he looked into his rear view mirror and saw a car go off the edge of the highway onto the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Perry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Smith v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Zones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Frazer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
- Paige v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
- Hudson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
- Weaver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008