Legal Opinion

Lapuck v. Commerce Insurance

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 16, 2015Published

1Opinion of the CourtFinnerty, J.

Following the presentation of the plaintiffs case in a jury trial, the trial judge granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to Mass. R. Civ. P., Rule 50(a), for a directed verdict. The plaintiff appeals, and we reverse.

Plaintiff Robert A. Lapuck, D.C. (“Lapuck”), a chiropractor, alleged that he provided services to one Dowling who was involved in a motor vehicle collision on June 20, 2008. The vehicle was at the time insured by defendant Commerce Insurance Company (“Commerce”) under a standard Massachusetts automobile insurance policy, which provided for personal injury protection (“PIP”)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Raunela v. Hertz Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  2. Alholm v. Town of WarehamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Kelly v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. DiMarzo v. S. & P. REALTY CORP.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  5. Power Service Supply, Inc. v. E. W. Wiggins Airways, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API