Legal Opinion

Wisnieski v. Coufal

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1974No. 39244PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

White,, C. J.

This is an action by plaintiff, a real estate broker, to recover from the defendants, owners of a farm, a broker’s commission under the terms of a listing contract. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant owners. This appeal follows. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.

This case was previously before this court on an appeal from a directed verdict for the defendants. Wisnieski v. Coufal, 188 Neb. 200, 195 N. W. 2d 750 (1972). We reversed and remanded, holding that under section 36-107, R. R. S. 1943, the terms of a sale need not be included in a listing contract…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wisnieski v. CoufalNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Louis Hoffman Co. v. Western Smelting & Refining Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Johnson v. NathanNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. In Re Polly's EstateNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Walkenhorst v. ApoliusNebraska Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pitt v. Checker Cab Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. David v. TuckerNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. In Re Conservatorship of HatcherNebraska Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API