Wisnieski v. Coufal
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClinton, J.
This is an action by plaintiff, a real estate broker, to recover from the defendants, owners of a farm, a broker’s commission under the terms of a listing contract. At the close of the plaintiff’s case, the motion of the defendants for a directed verdict was granted. We reverse the judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
We examine the evidence in the light of the following principle: A motion for a directed verdict must for the purpose of decision thereon be treated as an admission of the truth of all material and relevant evidence submitted on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ballou v. SherwoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- Larson v. SyversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- Ruzicka v. HotovyNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
- Powers v. BohuslavNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
- Howell v. NorthNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- George Clift Enters. v. Oshkosh Feedyard Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- Fleming Realty & Ins., Inc. v. EvansNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
- Mathine v. Kansas-Nebraska Natural Gas Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1972
- Agri Affiliates, Inc. v. BonesNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Dworak v. MichalsNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.