Gustav Adolph Building Ass'n v. Kratz
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. The cross-interrogatory to the appellee, alluded to in the opinion, was as follows: Have you paid State and City taxes for 1876, 1877 and 1878, on the property in question? Ans. No, sir. The exceptant objected to this cross-interrogatory, because, as he alleged, there was no proof that the taxes therein referred to were due and payable.
1Opinion of the CourtIrving, J.
It appears from this record that the appellant is a corporation, and that on the 29th of August, 1816, the appellee executed a mortgage to the appellant to secure eighteen hundred dollars advanced on twelve shares of the stock of the appellant. The appellee was a member of the corporation, and by the terms of his membership and the provisions of the mortgage, he was to pay to the appellant the weekly sum of six dollars, on every Thursday evening, until such time as the mortgagor should have eighteen hundred dollars to his credit by such payments, and the dividends passed to his credit. He was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Walker v. CockeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
- Columbian Building Ass'n of East Baltimore, No. 4 v. CrumpCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
- Cecil v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stewart v. McCaddinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
- Lotterer v. LeonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
- Saunders v. StradleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Horn v. BohnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
- Shirk v. CornellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920