Richey v. Perry Arnold, Inc.
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
An Administrative Law Judge determined in this post-award reopening filed by the claimant that a surgery the employer failed to pre-authorize was reasonable and necessary; that the employer must pay for the procedure and related expenses; but that the parties’ settlement precluded any claim for temporary total *707disability (TTD) benefits relative to the surgery. The ALJ also determined that the employer’s failure to pre-authorize or contest the surgery within 30 days did not warrant the imposition of sanctions.
The Workers’ Compensation Board reversed to the extent that it…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hilen v. HaysKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
- Frear v. P.T.A. Industries, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- 3D Entersprises Contracting Corp. v. Louisville Jefferson & County Metropolitan Sewer DistrictKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
- Cinelli v. WardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1998
- Bullock v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- First Technology Capital, Inc. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2014
- Steel Creations by and Through Kesa, the Kentucky Workers' Compensation Fund v. Injured Workers' PharmacyKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
- Ellis Popcorn Co. C/O Matrix Companies, Tpa v. Robert StognerKentucky Supreme Court · 2022
- Injured Workers Pharmacy v. Steel Creations by and Through Kesa, the Kentucky Workers' Compensation FundKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
- Injured Workers Pharmacy v. Steel Creations by and Through Kesa, the Kentucky Workers' Compensation FundKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.