Legal Opinion

Richey v. Perry Arnold, Inc.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 2012No. 2011-SC-000326-WCPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

An Administrative Law Judge determined in this post-award reopening filed by the claimant that a surgery the employer failed to pre-authorize was reasonable and necessary; that the employer must pay for the procedure and related expenses; but that the parties’ settlement precluded any claim for temporary total *707disability (TTD) benefits relative to the surgery. The ALJ also determined that the employer’s failure to pre-authorize or contest the surgery within 30 days did not warrant the imposition of sanctions.

The Workers’ Compensation Board reversed to the extent that it…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hilen v. HaysKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Frear v. P.T.A. Industries, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  3. 3D Entersprises Contracting Corp. v. Louisville Jefferson & County Metropolitan Sewer DistrictKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Cinelli v. WardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1998
  5. Bullock v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. First Technology Capital, Inc. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2014
  2. Steel Creations by and Through Kesa, the Kentucky Workers' Compensation Fund v. Injured Workers' PharmacyKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Ellis Popcorn Co. C/O Matrix Companies, Tpa v. Robert StognerKentucky Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Injured Workers Pharmacy v. Steel Creations by and Through Kesa, the Kentucky Workers' Compensation FundKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Injured Workers Pharmacy v. Steel Creations by and Through Kesa, the Kentucky Workers' Compensation FundKentucky Supreme Court · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API