Shadix v. Brown
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
The first count of the complaint charges the seduction of plaintiff, “she being chaste at the time”; and the second count alleges that at the time of the seduction plaintiff was “then and there a chaste unmarried woman.”
We are not called upon to determine whether a previously unchaste woman can maintain this action (see Smith v. Milburn, 17 Iowa, 30; Gemmill v. Brown, 25 Ind. App. 6, 56 N. E. 691; Love v. Masoner, 6 Baxt. [Tenn.] 24, 32 Am. Rep. 522; note to Bradshaw v. Jones [Tenn.] 76 Am. St. Rep. 668, 669); but, conceding that previous chastity is required, it is enough if the woman,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Whatley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- State v. . HortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Davis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
- Smith v. MilburnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Kelly v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Phillips v. AshworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Weir v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Green v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. HelmsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Seamons v. SpackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
- Strickling v. WhitesideSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.