Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Barber
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 22, 1927PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
The defendants were tried upon an indictment which charged them with an assault with intent to rape one *285Hazel Friedman. The defendants Brady and Downey rested at the close of the Commonwealth’s case. The defendant McCrensky rested after Barber had testified. A motion for a directed verdict was presented by each defendant and all were denied. All of the defendants were found guilty of the offence charged. The defendant Downey filed a motion for a new trial which was denied. Each defendant claimed an appeal and assigned as errors the denial of his motion for a directed verdict, certain…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DascalakisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Commonwealth v. SturtivantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Commonwealth v. TrefethenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Commonwealth v. MadeirosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Commonwealth v. DevereauxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BonomiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
- Commonwealth v. WatsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. LavalleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Commonwealth v. AdreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. KnowltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.