Legal Opinion

Hannonen v. McCloskey

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 25, 2025No. 3:24-cv-02408Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEENA HANNONEN, an individual; ) Case No.: 24-cv-2408-BEN-BLM AGNES BRADSHW, an individual, ) 12 ) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Plaintiff, 13 ) ALTER OR AMEND UNDER FED. R. v. ) CIV. P. 59(e) OR RECONSIDER 14 ) COURT’S RULING GRANTING MARK McCLOSKEY, an individual; 15 ) MOTION TO DISMISS TIMOTHY M. RYAN, an individual; ) 16 ANDREW J. MASE, an individual, ) MATTHEW H. AGUIRRE, an individual; 17 ) THE RYAN LAW FIRM, APC, a ) 18 California Professional Corporation; and ) DOES 5-25, 19 ) Defendant. ) 20 21 22 Before…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Kim King and Kent Norman v. Victor AtiyehCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Charles E. McDowell Jr. v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Allstate Insurance Companies v. Charles HerronCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API