Legal Opinion

People v. Samuels

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 16, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that County Court impermissibly penalized him for exercising his right to go to trial. “The imposition of a more severe sentence after trial than that offered to defendant pursuant to a plea offer that he rejected, without more, does not support the contention of defendant that he was penalized for exercising his right to go to trial” (People v Jones, 229 AD2d 980, lv denied 89 NY2d 925). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present —…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. TaplinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. People v. LusbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. People v. WoodsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API