Legal Opinion
People v. Jones
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 12, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in admitting the gun into evidence. The People showed that the gun was relevant to the charge of robbery in the first degree under Penal Law § 160.15 (4) (see, People v Saez, 69 NY2d 802, 804; People v Baskerville, 60 NY2d 374, 381), and they showed a sufficient nexus between defendant and the gun (see, People v Rowley, 160 AD2d 963, 964, lv dismissed 76 NY2d 896, lv denied 78 NY2d 926; People v Dinkins, 139 AD2d 759). Any issues concerning either the probative value of the gun or the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. PenaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. BaskervilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. SaezNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. LamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. DinkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. LawsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. LusbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. SamuelsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. GalvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998