Legal Opinion

Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 22, 2003No. 02-1915PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurley, J.

¶ 1. Tammy Kolupar appeals from the order and judgment awarding her $15,000 in attorney fees and costs, rather than the $53,000 in fees and costs requested, in her action against Wilde Pontiac, Cadillac, Inc. (Wilde) and its employee Randall Thompson, alleging that Thompson fraudulently sold Kolupar *663a substandard vehicle. Kolupar contends that the trial court: (1) erroneously exercised its discretion in failing to admit into evidence an invoice itemizing Kolupar's attorney's fees and litigation expenses; (2) erred in relying upon the recommendation of the discovery referee; (3) failed to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Martindale v. RippWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Village of Shorewood v. SteinbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Herro, McAndrews & Porter, S. C. v. GerhardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Narloch v. State, Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Aspen Services, Inc. v. IT Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Lynch v. Crossroads Counseling Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  4. Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  5. Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API