Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtCurley, J.
¶ 1. Tammy Kolupar appeals from the order and judgment awarding her $15,000 in attorney fees and costs, rather than the $53,000 in fees and costs requested, in her action against Wilde Pontiac, Cadillac, Inc. (Wilde) and its employee Randall Thompson, alleging that Thompson fraudulently sold Kolupar *663a substandard vehicle. Kolupar contends that the trial court: (1) erroneously exercised its discretion in failing to admit into evidence an invoice itemizing Kolupar's attorney's fees and litigation expenses; (2) erred in relying upon the recommendation of the discovery referee; (3) failed to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Martindale v. RippWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Village of Shorewood v. SteinbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- Herro, McAndrews & Porter, S. C. v. GerhardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Narloch v. State, Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Aspen Services, Inc. v. IT Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Lynch v. Crossroads Counseling Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
- Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.