McCarty v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Fifth Amendment Taking; Rails-to-Trails Act; Attorney Fees; Discovery; Depositions of Opposing Counsel.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAMS, Judge.
This matter comes before the Court in an unusual posture — on Defendant’s post-settle ment motion for leave to take depositions of opposing counsel, two attorneys and a paralegal from the law firm of Arent Pox, LLP, in conjunction with Plaintiffs’ motion for attorney fees and litigation expenses. 1 Defendant seeks this highly unusual discovery to establish that Plaintiffs’ fees should be based on a St. Louis, Missouri locality rate, rather than the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Davis County Solid Waste Management & Energy Recovery Special Service District v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Donnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Johnson v. UptonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- EDUCATION CREDITOR TRUST v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026