Legal Opinion

McCarty v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 15, 2017No. 14-316LPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Fifth Amendment Taking; Rails-to-Trails Act; Attorney Fees; Discovery; Depositions of Opposing Counsel.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAMS, Judge.

This matter comes before the Court in an unusual posture — on Defendant’s post-settle ment motion for leave to take depositions of opposing counsel, two attorneys and a paralegal from the law firm of Arent Pox, LLP, in conjunction with Plaintiffs’ motion for attorney fees and litigation expenses. 1 Defendant seeks this highly unusual discovery to establish that Plaintiffs’ fees should be based on a St. Louis, Missouri locality rate, rather than the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Davis County Solid Waste Management & Energy Recovery Special Service District v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  3. Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  4. Donnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  5. Johnson v. UptonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. EDUCATION CREDITOR TRUST v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API