Legal Opinion

Father Matthew Young Men's Total Abstinence v. Fitzwilliams

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1884PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Ewing-, C.

John J. Fitzwilliams was the treasurer of the plaintiff, and the other defendants were his securities on his bond as such treasurer. The suit was on the bond for alleged breaches thereof. There was a referee appointed under the statute, against the objection of defendants, on whose report judgment was entered, as upon a special verdict, for plaintiff, from which the defendants appealed to the St. Louis court of appeals, where the judgment of the circuit court was affirmed. The defendants bring the case here by appeal.

We have critically examined the record, the report of the referee,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Father Matthew Young Men's Total Abstinence & Benevolent Society v. FitzwilliamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1882

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Scovill Manufacturing Co. v. CassidyIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Doyle v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  3. St. Charles Savings Bank v. DenkeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  4. Smith v. Ohio Millers Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  5. Kenneth Investment Co. v. National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API