Legal Opinion

State v. Howell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 16, 1993No. 05-93-00813-CRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS, Justice.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether a trial court that suspects possible *238jury misconduct can dismiss a cause of action without the prosecutor’s consent. We hold a trial court does not have such authority. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s dismissal order.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Donnie Cleon Howell was charged by indictment with felony driving while intoxicated (DWI). He pleaded not guilty, and a jury trial began on April 23, 1992. The next day, Howell, outside the jury’s presence, offered to stipulate to two prior DWI convictions which were alleged for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. State v. MoralesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Barre v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. State v. FassCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. State v. Richard Marmolejo, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Donihoo, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API