Leary v. City of Watervliet
New York Supreme Court
Action to recover on a contract for the construction of a sewer.
1Opinion of the CourtRudd, J.
The plaintiffs made a contract with the defendant on the 20th of June, 1913, covering the construction of what is known as the storm sewer system, the work to be done according to certain plans and specifications. The work was done and payment has been made hy the city to the extent for which the city admits its liability and this action, is. brought to recover, moneys, which the plaintiffs allege are justly due for work done outside of and not contemplated by the contract and which work plaintiffs allege was *129necessary to be done by reason of the demands of the city, which could not have been…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Borough Construction Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Hoye v. . Pennsylvania R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Beckwith v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- People Ex Rel. Powers Mansfield Company v. . SchneiderNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
3Cited by2 opinions
- JA La Porte Corporation v. Mayor and City CouncilDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1936
- Cardell v. City of PerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1926