Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Newell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 16, 1940No. 29495PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

Plaintiff, Rose Newell, is the former owner of improved real estate in the city of Okmulgee which was, on April 17, 1939, sold at resale to the county for delinquent taxes. The taxes, interest, penalties, and costs amounted to $534.40, and there being no bidder, under the law, the property was bid off in the name of the county for the full amount due. Subsequently, on July 18, 1939, the property was sold to Jack Martin at “commissioner’s sale” for $85. On August 28, 1939, the plaintiff tendered-' to the county treasurer the amount for which the land had been sold at commissioner’s sale, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walton, Mayor v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. State Ex Rel. St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. BoyettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. GistSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Strawn v. HollimanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thompson v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Koehn v. FlumanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Shores v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Strawn v. HollimanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Hart v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API