Morse v. Morse
Supreme Court of Vermont
Bill in ChanobRT. The substantial averments of the bill are stated in tlie opinion of the court. The cause stood for hearing on bill, answer, replication, and proof, at the March term, 1871, when the court, Ross, Chancellor, pro forma dismissed the bill with costs, from which decree the orator appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Redefield, J.
This is a bill in equity for injunction to restrain the defendant from prosecuting certain suits at law.
The substantial averments in the orator’s supplemental bill are these: That the orator attached the defendant’s personal property in an action of assumpsit; that such property was sold by the sheriff, before judgment on the writ, under the statute, for the sum of 1342.19; that other suits were pending between the same parties, and all were referred, under .a rule of the court, to referees; that on the report of the referees, judgment was…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Spicer v. HoopIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Heath v. Capital Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1906
- Langdon v. TempletonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888