In Re a Motion to Compel Arbitration Between Hellenic Lines, Ltd. & Louis Dreyfus Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
TYLER, District Judge.
Petitioner Hellenic Lines, Ltd. (“Hellenic”) has moved to compel arbitration of a commercial dispute with the respondent, Louis Dreyfus Corporation (“Dreyfus”). 9U.S.C.4.
The basis of petitioner’s motion is a letter agreement signed by Dreyfus on December 24, 1964. Dreyfus concedes execution of this agreement to arbitrate, but sets up the defense of duress or coercion in its answer to the petition. Since this court could not be certain that the issues, especially the defense of duress, were sufficiently developed in the moving papers, this matter was set down for an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters of America v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Kentucky River Mills v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Darling-Singer Lumber Co. v. Oriental Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Cowley v. . FabienNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
3Cited by6 opinions
- Interocean Shipping Company v. National Shipping and Trading Corporation and Hellenic International Shipping, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- The First National Bank of Cincinnati v. Sidney Pepper, Elsie W. Cox, Defendants-Cross-Claimants-Appellants, Modern Talking Picture Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- In the Matter of a Motion to Compel Arbitration Between Hellenic Lines, Ltd., and Louis Dreyfus CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Transmarine Seaways Corp. v. Marc Rich & Co. A. G.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Rosenbalm Aviation Inc. v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.