Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Large

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 19, 1986No. 85-1351PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petitioners seek a writ of mandamus to compel the recusal of a circuit court judge on the ground that he was biased and prejudiced against the petitioners.

The underlying action arose when the parents of an injured minor child sought to have their contract with the petitioners set aside on the grounds that it was not being enforced as they understood it. The petitioners had represented the minor child, Stephanie Hayes, suing by and through her father and next friend, Artis Hayes, in a medical malpractice action in 1982; by the terms of the settlement reached in that case, the minor plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Ex Parte WhiteCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  5. Ex Parte Army Aviation Ctr. Fed. Cred. UnionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WhisenhantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Kitchens v. MayeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Ex Parte Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Ex Parte DuncanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API