Legal Opinion

Umlauf v. Gresen Manufacturing

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 16, 1986No. C0-86-741PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Relator Allan Umlauf seeks review of a determination he is not entitled to receive unemployment compensation benefits. Relator claims he was discharged due to his serious illness of alcoholism, which he had made consistent efforts to control. We affirm.

FACTS

Allan Umlauf was employed by respondent Gresen Manufacturing from 1967 until December 18, 1985, when he was discharged for reporting to work in an intoxicated condition.

Umlauf has a history of problems with alcohol. In 1980, he was convicted of drunk driving and was ordered to undergo outpatient chemical…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moeller v. Minnesota Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Leslin v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Kemp v. U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Independent School District No. 709 v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Peksa v. Fairview-Southdale Hosp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Hein v. Gresen DivisionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Peksa v. Fairview-Southdale HospitalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API