Legal Opinion

Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Blake

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 27, 1946No. 3595PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, C. J.

In answer to certain of the plaintiff’s contentions relating to the validity of the endorsement, attention is called to the fact that the Trial Court ruled, at the defendants’ request and without exception^ that the policy and endorsement were in full force and effect on July 14, 1938, and that the endorsement “added Mr. Blake as a named assured under the policy.”

The endorsement recites that “when signed by an authorized representative of the company and attached” to the policy “issued to Standard Oil Company of New Jersey et al,” it “shall be valid and shall form a part of said policy.” The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gilman v. GilmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915
  2. Gray v. GraySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. LamarreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. San Juan Racing Ass'nSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  2. Bencomo v. BencomoSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  3. Robinson v. GainesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  4. American Service Mutual Insurance Company v. Joe Bottum, IiiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  5. Edwards v. Commonwealth Mut. Fire Ins. Co. Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API