Maryland Casualty Co. v. Lamarre
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.
No question as to the correctness of the pleadings is raised. There was no evidence of collusion to bring about the accident or to produce the injuries. The contrary is found. The issue presented at the hearing was solely upon the insured’s alleged fraudulent conduct as respects the litigation.
By the terms of the policy the company undertook the investigation of accidents covered thereby, and the defence of suits thereon. The policy contained no express provisions requiring the aid and assistance of the assured therein, or restricting his conduct in respect thereto. His active and passive…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Roberts v. Central Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
- Harrison v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1929
- Leavitt v. BaconSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. BlakeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
- Comstock v. ComstockSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.