Legal Opinion
State v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 4, 1979No. 76-934C, CA 12160PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for murder, alleging that the use by the state of prior recorded testimony of certain witnesses from his first trial violated his right of confrontation and that evidence which was seized from his home after a warrantless search should have been suppressed.
Defendant’s first conviction for murder was reversed and remanded for a new trial by this Court, State v. Anderson, 33 Or App 43, 575 P2d 677 (1978). Prior to defendant’s second trial the state was unable to locate and serve with subpoenas witnesses Charles Jackson, Steve Reyez (Esquibel), Victoria Cook and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. MagnanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. MinceyArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Peña v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Pena v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- State of Tennessee v. Thomas Lee HutchisonTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.