Dymak v. Haskins Bros.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.
This is a proceeding instituted in this court by Haskins Brothers & Company and Great American Indemnity Company, to review an award of compensation made by the district court for Douglas county against the appellants and in favor of Mamie Dymak on July 13, 1936.
Section 48-174, Comp. St. Supp. 1935, provides that this judgment, so appealed from, may be “modified or set aside only upon the following grounds: (1) That the court acted without or in excess of its powers. (2) That the judgment, order or award was procured by fraud. (3) That the findings of fact are not conclusively supported by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gilkeson v. Northern Gas Engineering Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Wingate v. Evans Model LaundryNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- Radil v. Morris & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1919
- Poast v. Omaha Merchants Express & Transfer Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Hackley-Phelps-Bonnell Co. v. CooleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Miller v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- US West Communications, Inc. v. TaborskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Benson v. Barnes & Barnes TruckingNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Sporcic v. Swift & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1948
- Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. OzmunSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.