Legal Opinion

West Suburban Mass Transit District v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 7, 1991No. 1-89-2916PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McMORROW

Plaintiff Burlington Northern Railroad Company (Burlington) filed suit against defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation (Consolidated) for damages that occurred when Burlington’s train derailed. Burlington’s complaint alleged in pertinent part that the parties had entered into an indemnity agreement that required Consolidated to assume liability for the accident. Consolidated filed an answer to the complaint in which Consolidated admitted the occurrence of the derailment as well as the existence and terms of the indemnity agreement, but denied liability for the loss pursuant to the indemnity…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Janes v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Zimmerman v. Northfield Real Estate, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Motz v. Central National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. Beard v. Mount Carroll Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wright v. City of DanvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Lavelle v. Dominick's Finer Foods, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. American National Bank v. PowellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. Cagan v. Intervest Midwest Real Estate Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  5. Triple R Development v. Golfview Apartments IAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API