Legal Opinion

Huls v. Huls

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 28, 1954No. 1027PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHildebrant, J.

This appeal is presented de novo to this court upon the pleadings and the record from the trial court, together with defendants’ depositions and exhibits.

Prior to October 2, 1941, B. F. Huls, now deceased, his wife, Ada H. Huls, defendant, appellant herein, their son, Wills H. Huls (a. k. a. Jack Huls), plaintiff, appellee herein, and their daughter, Mary A. Huls, defendant, appellant herein, lived as a family unit on a rented farm in Butler County, and were engaged in genera] farming with the usual livestock, tools and equipment to be found thereon. From about 1931, the family bank account…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Beal v. BealOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bryan v. LookerOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Hofstad v. ChristieWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  4. McCarthy v. LippittOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. United States v. LongDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API