Boyce v. Union Pacific Railway Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal -from a judgment of the district court of the third district and from an order refusing a new trial. The opinion states the facts. Cited 2 Shearman é Redfield, Neg. § 704, Bennett v. Railroad Company, 102 U. S. 577, Heaven v, Pender, 11 L. B. (Q. B. D.) 503.
1Opinion of the Court
BlaCKbuRN, J.:
This suit is brought for damages on account of injuries caused by the negligence of the defendant. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff; motion for new trial; motion overruled; and appeal both from the overruling of the motion for a new trial and the judgment.
Several errors are assigned, but the only one insisted upon is that the evidence does not support the verdict *354and judgment. The complaint, among other things, alleges that defendant conducted a bathing resort known as “ Garfield Beach” on the shores of Great Salt Lake. That defendant had exclusive control of the waters of the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Turlington v. Tampa Electric Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1911
- Larkin v. Saltair Beach Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1905
- McKinney v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
- Beverley Beach Club, Inc. v. MarronCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Johnson v. Hot Springs Land & Imp. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.