Legal Opinion

State v. Corbett

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 2, 1895PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Certiorari to Garland Chancery Court. Leland Leatherman, Chancellor. statement by the court. On the 17th October, 1895, C. Y. Teague, prosecuting attorney for the seventh judicial circuit, made and filed his affidavit before W. A; Kirk, one of the justices of the peace within and for Garland county, in substance alleging and charging that one James J. Corbett, in said county, had threatened to engage in a prize fight or glove contest with one Robert Fitzsimmons, and that…

Read the full summary

Certiorari to Garland Chancery Court. Leland Leatherman, Chancellor. statement by the court. On the 17th October, 1895, C. Y. Teague, prosecuting attorney for the seventh judicial circuit, made and filed his affidavit before W. A; Kirk, one of the justices of the peace within and for Garland county, in substance alleging and charging that one James J. Corbett, in said county, had threatened to engage in a prize fight or glove contest with one Robert Fitzsimmons, and that said Corbett threatens and is about to commit an assault and battery upon the person of said Fitzsimmons, the same being of…

1Opinion of the Court

Bunn, C. J.,

(after stating the facts.) The principal question in this case arises from the contention of the appellee, and the decision of the chancellor, that the statute digested as sections 1842 and 1843, and commonly known as the “Anti-Prize-Fighting Baw,” is invalid. The argument by which it has been sought to be shown to be invalid is this: The original act entitled “An act to punish and prevent prize fighting in Arkansas” approved March 31, 1891, was invalid as to its second section ; and that renders the corresponding section of the act of April 13, 1893, also invalid, the latter…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blessing v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Post Master General v. EarlySupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. McCulloch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  5. The People v. . the Supervisors of ChenangoNew York Court of Appeals · 1853

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Carlton v. GrimesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  2. Harrington v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  3. Binion, Sheriff v. Oklahoma Gas Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. People ex rel. City of Springfield v. EdmandsIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Reynolds v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API