Legal Opinion

Post Master General v. Early

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 15, 1827PublishedCited by 59 opinions

THIS was an action of debt, commenced in the Circuit Court fof the district of Georgia, by the District Attorney of the United States for that district, in the name of the Post Master General of. the United States, gainst the defendants, on a bond executed by them, in June. 1820, to the Post Master General of the United States, the condition of which, after reciting that Eleazer Early (one of the coobligors and defendants in the suit) is Post Master at Savannah, provides,…

Read the full summary

THIS was an action of debt, commenced in the Circuit Court fof the district of Georgia, by the District Attorney of the United States for that district, in the name of the Post Master General of. the United States, gainst the defendants, on a bond executed by them, in June. 1820, to the Post Master General of the United States, the condition of which, after reciting that Eleazer Early (one of the coobligors and defendants in the suit) is Post Master at Savannah, provides, that if he shall perform the duties of his office, “ add shall, pay all moneys that shall come to his hands for the…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Marshall

The post office department was established at the commencement of the revolution, under the superintendence of a Post Master General, who was authorized to appoint his deputies, and was made responsible for their conduct. Soon a^ter ad°pti°n of the present government, in September, 1789, Congress passed a temporary act, directing that a Post Master General should be appointed, and that his powers, and, the regulations of his office, should be the same as they last were, “ under the resolutions and ordinances of the last Congress.’.’ The power of appointing deputies, therefore, and the…

2Cited by59 opinions

  1. United States v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. State v. HardenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. The United States, in Error v. Phineas Bradley, Surviving Administrator of David Ott DeceasedSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  4. Blanchard v. Detroit, Lansing & Lake Michigan RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  5. District of Columbia v. HuttonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API