Legal Opinion

Lott v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 27, 1939No. 5175PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLEY, Justice.

Three motions have been filed in this cause. The first was filed by W. D. Scott, individually, as one of the defendants in error herein, asking that we dismiss the cause for lack of jurisdiction by reason of the alleged improper service of the writ of error, and for alleged irregularities in the writ of error bond. The second motion was filed by W. D. Scott, individually and as independent executor under the will of Belle Lott, deceased, and G. L. Scott and Mrs. Lucy Teasley, defendants in error, asking that we strike the purported statement of facts herein. The third motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Victory v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Pacific Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Brillhart v. BeeverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Rhoades v. El Paso & S. W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crawford v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  2. Gibbs v. CrittendenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API