Legal Opinion

Silcox v. McLean

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1932No. 3636PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKLEY, O. J.

Appellee (plaintiff) contracted in writing to sell, and appellant (defendant) agreed to buy, a parcel of land. The plaintiff, charging that he had performed the contract on his part and that defendant had failed therein, sued for specific performance.

Defendant answered, denying that plaintiff had performed his part of the agreement and affirmatively alleged that the contract had been rescinded.

Appellant claims that his original answer sets up a parol agreement and also an agreement “in writing” for rescission. Plaintiff in his reply denied all averments of the answer by way of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sternberger v. . McGovernNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Hoard v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Epstein v. WaasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Security Trust & Savings Bank v. RavelNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Dobler v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gaido v. TysdalWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Garlock v. WAKE COUNTY BD. OF EDUC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API