Legal Opinion
Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Lindholm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 12, 1933No. 6901Published
1Opinion of the Court
66 F.2d 56 (1933)
FIDELITY & DEPOSIT CO. OF MARYLAND et al.
v.
LINDHOLM.
No. 6901.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 12, 1933.
Rehearing Denied July 24, 1933.
Clarence B. Runkle and Joe Crider, Jr., both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland.
William A. Monten, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
Albert L. Lindholm, deceased, was, at the time this action was commenced, the administrator of the estate of Peter L. Lindholm, deceased. Peter L. Lindholm, deceased,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. HenseySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Buckstaff v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Whitney v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- County of Sonoma v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.