Legal Opinion

Village of Kildeer v. LaRocco

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 6, 1992No. 2—91—1465PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McLAREN

Plaintiff, the Village of Kildeer, appeals from the trial court’s directed finding for defendant, Edward C. LaRocco, and the subsequent denial of its post-judgment motion. Defendant had been charged with violating plaintiff’s municipal ordinance prohibiting overweight vehicles on its roads when he allegedly drove a truck whose tandem axles (Nos. 2 and 3) exceeded the 24,000-pound limit by 10,460 pounds. (See Kildeer, Ill., Village Code §10—2—6 (19_) (hereinafter Village Code).) The trial court granted defendant’s motion for a directed finding in response to his argument that a truck must be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kokinis v. KotrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. City of Chicago v. JoyceIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. FairAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  4. Prevendar v. ThonnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. People v. HansenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Village of Plainfield v. American Cedar Designs, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  2. Village of North Aurora v. AnkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. Village of Lisle v. SpelsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  4. Cavalier v. Speedway, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
  5. VILLAGE OF RICHMOND v. MageeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API