Legal Opinion

Rowe v. City of Ballard

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1898No. 2830PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Orange Jacobs, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

This is an action brought by the appellants, Mary Ellen Rowe and her husband Anthony Rowe, for alleged damages sustained by Mary Ellen Rowe in falling into an excavation or pit in one of the streets within the corporate limits of Ballard. The street had not been graded at this point, but the evidence shows that it had been used by wagons, carriages and pedestrians, and that well-defined roads and paths had been beaten in such street. The hole was from six to ten feet deep and from fifty to sixty feet wide, and was at the intersection of two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sutton v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Town of Albion v. HetrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Carroll v. Centralia Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brabon v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Prather v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Smith v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Colquhon v. City of HoquiamWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Peterson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API