Legal Opinion

Howard v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 10, 2013PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge QUIGLEY.

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation (DOT), has filed a preliminary objection to the pro se original jurisdiction petition for review filed by Harold Howard (Howard). Howard seeks an order of Court requiring DOT to reinstate his operating privilege where DOT suspended his driver’s license for failure to submit to chemical testing pursuant to Section 1547 of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1547, often called the Implied Consent Law. We agree with DOT that Howard failed to exhaust his statutory remedy and, therefore, sustain the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Guarrasi v. ScottCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Jackson v. Centennial School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Luke v. CataldiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Muir v. AlexanderCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC v. GoldenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. J.P. Frankenberry v. T.S. FergusonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API