Legal Opinion

Bauer v. Piper Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 20, 1990No. 89-1247PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyse, J.

Piper Industries, Inc., appeals a judgment finding it liable for damages resulting from an injury sustained by William Bauer while he was operating a Super D forage harvester. Piper contends that Bauer was negligent as a matter of law because he failed to heed warnings in the company's instruction manual and because he placed his foot too close to the machine's cutting apparatus, that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury's award of lost earning capacity, and that Bauer's settlement offer did not trigger the statutory prejudgment interest provision of sec. 807.01, Stats. We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fehring v. Republic InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. LePoidevin Ex Rel. Dye v. WilsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Herman v. Milwaukee Children's HospitalCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  4. Sachsenmaier v. MittlestadtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dillen v. Healthone, L.L.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Dillen v. Healthone, L.L.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Piette v. HornCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API