Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Raso

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 2011No. 2010-2203PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Frank Anthony Raso of Brunswick, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0069270, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1998. In April 2010, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a two-count complaint charging respondent with multiple violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility and the Rules of Professional Conduct arising from his representation of two clients. 1

{¶ 2} After reviewing the parties’ stipulations of fact and misconduct, a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline dismissed, sua sponte, allegations that respondent had charged an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Angelo Benedetti, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. StollingsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mahoning County Bar Association v. HanniOhio Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API