United States v. Randall

The appellants attack the judgment of conviction upon -three grounds, none of which has sufficient merits to require extended discussion. They urge (1) that the provisions of the Second War Power Act of 1942, pursuant to which Ration Order 5C purports to be .issued, amount to an unconstitutional delegation of power; (2) that the Ration Order is invalid because not supported by appropriate findings of fact; and (3) that the indictment is insufficient to charge an offense against the United States.(1) Subsection (a) (2) of section 2 of Act June 28, 1940, as amended by Second War Powers Act of…