Felts v. State

DAVIDSOM, Presiding Judge.

This is a companion case to Hooton v. State, this day affirmed. Hooton was convicted of theft, whereas appellant was convicted of theft from the person.

The evidence, to say the least of it, is very meager in regard to appellant’s connection with the case. There is no evidence in this record showing that appellant ever touched the person of the alleged injured party. The testimony discloses that Hoskinson, the alleged owner, became stupidly drunk or under the influence of some narcotic, which put him into an unconscious stupor. Before becoming stupefied, and while…