Moore v. State

ON REHEARING.

June 27, 1919.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

It is urged that this court erred in its opinion affirming this ease, in not passing on the question and revei’sing the case for the failure of the trial court to charge on circumstantial evidence. It appears that this contention was not stressed on the former presentation, and this point was overlooked in the former opinion. We are of opinion that the contention of appellant is sound. Exception was duly reversed to the failure of the trial court to charge on circumstantial evidence, and the point is properly brought before us in the record.…